When Children Become as Convenient as Pets "San Franciscans may think of their town as a haven for tolerance, but once again, S.F. supervisors are showing the rest of America how intolerant The Special City can be. Forget a flower in your hair. If you come to San Francisco, be sure to wear a muzzle on your brain. Criticize a supervisor, and some supes will do their utmost to get you fired. Last week, KGO radio talk-show host Pete Wilson made some comments about a child born to Supervisor Bevan Dufty, who is gay, and Rebecca Goldfader, who is a lesbian. As Wilson put it, a baby is 'not an experiment. It is not an opportunity to see how far you can carry your views on parenting, alternative lifestyles or diversity in family structures.' " . . . read more |
|---|
The Rest of the Story
From the above news story of the San Francisco talk-radio host, we have learned that in San Francisco they have found another way to screw free speech, not surprising in the most intolerant city in America.
But now it has risen to a new level not unlike the hate that was spread against the Jews in Nazi Germany, and not dissimilar to the public relation campaign that had been run by the Third Reich, its objective to shut up the Jews within an elitist, intellectual German society.
This was effective through the use of an old friend to humanity, Fascism. Fascism permits livelihoods to be threatened for the purpose of shutting people up who disagree with you. This technique, now used by some in the homosexual community, is what has given rise to the Pink Swastika.
So what do you think of this ultra new trend in continued hate speech by radical homosexuals against straights, probably created by the loving folks at GLAAD? And did you catch their key phrase in the news story at the top of the page on how children are conceived by a man and a women . . . countering "a child is not an opportunity to see how far you can carry your views on parenting, alternative lifestyles or diversity in family structures.' "
Here again is what the radical said about straight conception:
'I would never ask how much grunting and sweating there was -- and God knows it probably it didn't last very long -- at that kid's conception.'
And as lesbians have already messed with the gene pool to purposely create a defective human being in the form of new born children, they've taken it one step further by using a single word quickly filtering through the gay community. They now call straights hatefully "breeders."
The use of that word shows their attempt to legitimize their act of creating children as the "norm," and not the one "where grunting and sweating occur." They do this to make light of two humans (a man and a woman) who conceive children through intercourse then hatefully refer to their act as "breeders."
So was the radio announcer wrong?
Looking at the objective of the activists, we don't believe so. Remember what two deaf lesbian women actually went through a few years ago so they could create their very own designer baby, seeking an abnormal sperm doner so that the baby would be born deaf and in the mother's own words "for her personal enjoyment?"
We think this is just the tip of a very frightening trend by radical homosexuals to create humans for their own enjoyment. The deaf lesbians did not create a baby to have a baby. They wanted to create a baby so they could enjoy the idea of raising a deaf child, then went about making sure that a normal child would instead be born deaf. There wasn't one around so they must have thought, "Let's not allow that inconvenience to get in our way. We'll just simply have one made."
In the end, the talk-show host was right. Under these conditions, the child suddenly becomes no different than a pet.
And here is the proof of the eating of the pudding. Did the homosexual community condemn the creation of a deaf baby by the two Lesbian mothers?
Not a peep. Not even a whimper. Just deadly silence.