|
A Shark's Tale or Another Hollywood Fable? (You decide.) Summer 2007 We have no problem with diversity when it's not meant for everyone, which seems rare in today's progressive America. So when gay advocates in Hollywood quietly sell their lifestyle to little children in a cartoon through the assistance of Steven Spielberg's Dreamworks, its being used as propaganda buried within a film's story line, it becomes all too clear to us its just another sad day for the movie industry. It just goes to prove again that Hollywood has truly become an island unto itself, no longer reflecting the country's majority values, needing to be cast adrift to attach itself to another grateful nation. A Shark's Tale, in the form of a cartoon, is another reminder how propaganda can be easily used as a tool by a small circle of self-serving friends that wish to push their radical agendas onto unsuspecting children and their parents, using the distribution system of theatres across the country. Propaganda means the real message is purposely and cleverly disguised within another story. There is a word for this. It's called deception. For Hollywood's elitists to assume they have permission to sell propaganda to our kids probably also explains why several big stars in Hollywood felt they, too, had permission to curse out conservative values at John Kerry's New York Gala Affair during the 2004 presidential election, Kerry saying after hearing these stars, " they represent the best America has to offer." It's why a conservative group put up billboards in Hollywood, thanking these actors for instead helping to get the Republican candidate elected to office. This mistake started when my wife and I decided to go see the movie, A Shark's Tale, just for fun at a local pizza / theatre called the "Brew and View." As everyday grandparents might do during an uneventful day, we wanted to fill a lazy Saturday afternoon with some non-offensive entertainment, obviously not realizing the hidden theme that was within this seemingly innocent cartoon. As we sat there we began to feel betrayed, disappointed, and then disgusted as we watched Hollywood use a cartoon as a tool to sell us and those in the audience, many of them children, on cross-dressing. In the movie, even the "Shark Mob Boss" is shown to tell others he was sorry he didn't understand [about diversity] the motivation of his cross-dressing finned son who wouldn't eat other fish. Robert De Niro, who played the mob boss shark, should have gotten the message of the film and passed it by, our believing he could easily find other useful messages for his amazing talent. Of course there may be a niche for future films that may need an actor open to cross-dressing. We have no other link for you to click on where Dreamworks discusses this subject as to why it's in the movie or why it's never mentioned in the plot, advertising, or the movie's trailer. Even critics have avoided discussing it, which of course is not surprising understanding the guidelines politically-correct critics will follow these days. Yet in the movie, the young-adult male shark is clearly shown, when hidden from his tough mob father by other sympathizing fish, to be delighted to be able to dress in women's clothing in front of his friends. Duh! We don't care if this was the message of the movie. It's a free country. But instead, Hollywood wants you to put your dime down for deceiving you of their intention with this movie, understanding if you were told ahead the movie was about a cross-dressing shark, not many of you would have allowed your children to attend. And that's were the problem lies. Deception is never a good thing. And to make things worse, it's coming from Spielberg's Dreamworks, Spielberg the millionaire director/producer who is demanding that advocating gays be role models for young boys in the Scouts. He claims he would be glad to support the Scouts again if they would simply allow themselves to become sanitized from their religious roots and join the secular ACLU world he embraces of gay activism and the "exciting" and dangerous sodomy that goes with it. Now let's look at the other side of the equation, and that it's not nice to fool Mother Nature. What would happen, if in the real ocean, sharks were not allowed to be sharks but instead were just another fish that swam the seas to become a kinder, gentler, and more loving species of everything while not eating other fish? If that happened, the entire ecology of the ocean would be thrown into chaos. So to tell children sharks that eat other fish are bad, well that's just plain stupid. In fact it's a dirty lie, and it's done at the expense to sell gay ideology to straight children. Ugh! Advocating gays need to learn to get along with the rest of America and stop shoving their lifestyle in the faces of other people and their families who just aren't interested in the anal sex that goes along for the ride with their lifestyle. Not only does the message become confusing and dangerous to the thinking of America's children, it hides the dangers of certain habits along with realities of life in the ocean. Forget your God or your religion. Let's get some facts straight. The anus was meant by Mother Nature for the excretion of wastes from the human body, which includes the elimination of dangerous bacteria and viruses. It's how nature keeps us healthy and prevents the spread of disease and destruction into the human species. But when the male penis of a gay is penetrated into the same area, remembering there is an opening in that male organ that allows these same vile bacteria and viruses to enter, it spreads diseases that puts our entire country at risk one person at a time, one year at a time, one decade at a time until it becomes totally out of control . . . finally totally resistant to drugs. For those who were yet unborn at the time, older Americans remember in the 1970's when the newspapers reported there were 10 cases of AIDS in New York City, then 100, then 1,000 . . . some saying it came from Africa where humans were having sex with animals. That unbelievably is a concept that has been promoted for almost a decade by professor Peter Singer of Princeton's, are you ready, of the Human Ethic's Department. Now there are tens-of-millions infected around the world and people are dying horrible deaths all because of dirty needles, unsafe sex, and the act of sodomy, an act now blessed by the Supreme Court of the land as "none of our business," even if kills a friend or relative. So we ask Hollywood and its arrogant anti-hero, Steven Spielberg, who walked away from so many disappointed young boys in the Scouts in the early 1990's, how about a cartoon on this subject to help the country? It starts out with two male sharks trying to mate, one suddenly being infected with a disease. As one spreads Shark AIDS to the other, suddenly after years of unnatural sex among sharks, the entire population sees pockets of other sharks becoming sick and disabled, in turn affecting the ecological balance across entire oceans of the world! Wow, now there's a special effect. But it's not meant to be funny. With new stains of AIDS now found in New York City, it's "here we go again," time with these special strains evolving to bull blown AIDS in just months. This is no longer an issue of diversity, but from Darwin's own mouth instead an issue of survival of the fittest. And with HALF of today's teenagers expected to be infected with an STD when reaching 25-years of age, nothing is funny about what the liberal agenda is doing to our families across America with its extremes, especially while using children's cartoons. So don't hold your breath on any movies from Hollywood on these subject to warn America of the coming carnage. Hollywood is not about common sense. It's about elitism and political correctness, which are the real dangers to a democracy as cross-dressing sharks are to the real ocean. By the way, for those who think the world is filled these days with only colored balloons and the past is gone forever, similar to Steven Spielberg's walking away from the Scouts, we need to remind everyone that over three thousand Neo-Nazis marched in Germany at the 2005 Munich Festival that was designed to only celebrate the end of WWII. It was reported that the three thousand were among an estimated five thousand that had met earlier on that day. And in Sweden skinheads are marching not for any Nazi cause, but to protest Swedish gays having sex with children. There efforts would seem noble, which will hopefully worry some in America and begin to change the tide. Americans would not want their sons and daughters to fight a future enemy to protect the rights of a few who want sodomy and cross-dressing as a way of life in America. Our fathers and grandfathers fought for the flag, apple pie, and motherhood in WWII. But with these simple values now attacked daily by the liberals in Hollywood and the elite media, we need to be reminded that we still live in a very dangerous world. If we don't change our thinking soon back to the basics of life that ensure our safety, we will not be prepared nor have the resolve to win the next time we are challenged, remembering that the old enemy will be sure not to make the same mistakes twice. Which side will you want to be on, and which one could you defend to the death? It's an interesting question in a time of political correctness gone amuck.
|
